get_gcat_satcat

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description implies read-only operation ('Look up'), mentions limit and default return count, but does not disclose auth needs, rate limits, output format, or any side effects. Without annotations, transparency is adequate but not thorough.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Starts with clear purpose and constraints, followed by an args list. Slightly verbose but well-structured. Front-loaded with the essential query rule.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description could explain the return format or typical record structure. It refers to list_gcat_options() for field meanings but does not set expectations for the tool's output. Adequate but not fully self-contained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds detailed meaning for all parameters: explains jcat, satcat_num, name (with case-insensitive note), and limit default. Fully compensates for lack of schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it looks up GCAT SATCAT records by identifier with specific arguments (jcat, satcat_num, name). However, it does not distinguish from sibling 'query_gcat_satcat' which might perform broader queries.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states to provide exactly one of three identifiers and suggests using list_gcat_options() for field descriptions. Lacks guidance on when not to use this tool or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.