Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gradescop

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to read Moodle course information, list courses, outlines, resources, assignments, and deadlines, and download or extract text from course files locally via an MCP-compatible client.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language, read-only access to a user's own learning-management account for courses, assignments and deadlines, lecture attendance, notices, grades, and syllabus evidence, including reading page/slide/cell locations inside PDF, Office, HWP/HWPX, HTML, and ZIP attachments. Runs locally over stdio or remotely over OAuth-protected Streamable HTTP for desktop and mobile clients, and can compare changes against a locally encrypted baseline.
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable AI clients to query course announcements, deadlines, grades, and assignments and to preview or incrementally sync course materials to local storage.
      10
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (courses, assignments, submissions, feedback, documents, changes). The only mild overlap is between connect/connection_status (live login vs stored health) and sync/sync_status (trigger vs poll), but descriptions explicitly differentiate these cases. An agent can reliably pick the right tool in nearly all situations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case, and the majority follow a verb_noun pattern (list_courses, get_assignment, get_submission, read_document, search_coursework, get_changes). A few are bare verbs or noun_status forms (connect, sync, connection_status, sync_status), which are minor deviations from the dominant convention but still readable and consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each one earns its place: connection, sync lifecycle, and the read paths for courses, assignments, submissions, feedback, documents, and archive changes. No redundant or filler tools are present.

    Completeness4/5

    For a read/archival surface the coverage is strong: connection, sync, discovery, assignments, submissions, feedback, documents, search, and change tracking are all present. Minor gaps exist (no explicit course-detail tool or standalone rubric-metadata tool), but these are workable around via get_assignment and get_feedback.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues