Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gradescop

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language, read-only access to a user's own learning-management account for courses, assignments and deadlines, lecture attendance, notices, grades, and syllabus evidence, including reading page/slide/cell locations inside PDF, Office, HWP/HWPX, HTML, and ZIP attachments. Runs locally over stdio or remotely over OAuth-protected Streamable HTTP for desktop and mobile clients, and can compare changes against a locally encrypted baseline.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language queries across multiple schools' Canvas and Blackboard accounts for courses, notifications, assignments, grades, feedback, and schedules, with read-only access and local todo/calendar export.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP clients with structured local access to Canvas LMS data—such as assignments, rubrics, module readings, feedback, and deadlines—for academic planning via stdio, using an authenticated browser session instead of an API token.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (courses, assignments, submissions, feedback, documents, changes). The only mild overlap is between connect/connection_status (live login vs stored health) and sync/sync_status (trigger vs poll), but descriptions explicitly differentiate these cases. An agent can reliably pick the right tool in nearly all situations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names are snake_case, and the majority follow a verb_noun pattern (list_courses, get_assignment, get_submission, read_document, search_coursework, get_changes). A few are bare verbs or noun_status forms (connect, sync, connection_status, sync_status), which are minor deviations from the dominant convention but still readable and consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each one earns its place: connection, sync lifecycle, and the read paths for courses, assignments, submissions, feedback, documents, and archive changes. No redundant or filler tools are present.

    Completeness4/5

    For a read/archival surface the coverage is strong: connection, sync, discovery, assignments, submissions, feedback, documents, search, and change tracking are all present. Minor gaps exist (no explicit course-detail tool or standalone rubric-metadata tool), but these are workable around via get_assignment and get_feedback.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues