get_disk_info
Retrieves disk usage and mount point information for Ubuntu systems. Use to monitor storage availability and filesystem status.
Instructions
ディスク使用量・マウントポイント情報を返します。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieves disk usage and mount point information for Ubuntu systems. Use to monitor storage availability and filesystem status.
ディスク使用量・マウントポイント情報を返します。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not mention any behavioral traits (e.g., read-only, no side effects). Agent cannot infer safety without prior knowledge.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no wasted words, front-loaded with key information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with no params and no output schema; description adequately covers purpose. Minor omission: no mention of instantaneous nature or side-effect-free behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so description adds no extra meaning; baseline 4 applies since schema coverage is trivially 100%.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'returns disk usage and mount point information' with specific verb+resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_cpu_info, get_memory_info.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs. siblings. User must infer context from names alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/duelist2021jp/WSL2-Ubuntu-MCP-Server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server