claude-ops-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to claude-ops-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to inspect any public domain’s web technology stack, email deliverability and DNS health (MX, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, BIMI), and HTTPS security posture with typed JSON scores and remediation-ready findings, plus history, bulk checks, monitoring alerts, and reverse technology lookups.12476 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to scan a website's HTTP security headers and receive an A–F grade against OWASP best practices, including per-header pass/warn/fail results and copy-paste fixes for missing headers.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to run read-only technical SEO and AI-search-readiness audits on any URL via GET/HEAD requests. Checks on-page elements like titles, meta descriptions, headings, canonical and Open Graph tags, JSON-LD validity, alt text and link health, plus robots.txt, sitemaps and llms.txt for crawler access.13 npmMIT

Enterno.io MCP serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceThis server provides comprehensive website diagnostics, allowing AI agents and clients to perform detailed HTTP, DNS, SSL/TLS, security header, SEO, and AI-readiness checks on any public website. It covers a wide range of tools including WHOIS, email checks, and network analysis.MIT- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables agents to run SEO and AI-search readiness audits (llms.txt, crawler access, sitemaps, structured data, redirects, indexability, and more), look up startup revenue listings and leaderboards, and check a domain's SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MX records with concrete fixes. Runs locally over stdio with no account or API key, and frames all third-party responses as untrusted data.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants such as Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Claude Code to run 25+ specialized SEO checks on any URL, generate XML sitemaps and robots.txt files, extract brand design elements, and audit technical SEO, content quality, mobile responsiveness, and security.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct diagnostic concern (DNS, mail auth, TLS, certs, HTTP, redirects, headers, sitemaps) and descriptions cross-reference to resolve overlaps, e.g. dns_lookup explicitly redirects users to mail_auth. The main ambiguity is between tls_inspect and cert_expiry (both cert-related) and between http_probe and redirect_chain (both follow redirects), though the depth-vs-bulk distinction is explained.
All names use snake_case consistently, which is predictable. Minor deviation in that some follow noun_verb (dns_lookup, tls_inspect) while others use noun_noun (cert_expiry, redirect_chain, security_headers), but the convention is still readable and coherent.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a read-only site/infra diagnostics server. Each tool earns its place covering a distinct layer (DNS, mail, TLS, HTTP, headers, sitemap) with no filler.
For a read-only diagnostics surface the coverage is strong: DNS, email auth, TLS/certs, HTTP health, redirects, security headers and sitemap auditing form a coherent lifecycle. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no latency/uptime sweep across many hosts, no whois/domain-level checks, no port-level diagnostics) but core workflows are covered.