Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to claude-ops-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to scan a website's HTTP security headers and receive an A–F grade against OWASP best practices, including per-header pass/warn/fail results and copy-paste fixes for missing headers.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to analyze public websites, follow progress, retrieve shareable reports, compare multiple URLs, list checks and recent activity, and surface fixes ranked by impact.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude with 121 tools for website operations, Google Marketing, SEO, performance analysis, security auditing, monitoring, and accessibility testing.
      121
      10 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform passive security scans on domains, checking email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS weaknesses, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain-takeover risk without needing an API key.
      7
      62 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform cybersecurity analysis including RDAP lookup, DNS analysis, SSL inspection, security header detection, and more, returning structured security reports.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct diagnostic concern (DNS, mail auth, TLS, certs, HTTP, redirects, headers, sitemaps) and descriptions cross-reference to resolve overlaps, e.g. dns_lookup explicitly redirects users to mail_auth. The main ambiguity is between tls_inspect and cert_expiry (both cert-related) and between http_probe and redirect_chain (both follow redirects), though the depth-vs-bulk distinction is explained.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use snake_case consistently, which is predictable. Minor deviation in that some follow noun_verb (dns_lookup, tls_inspect) while others use noun_noun (cert_expiry, redirect_chain, security_headers), but the convention is still readable and coherent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a read-only site/infra diagnostics server. Each tool earns its place covering a distinct layer (DNS, mail, TLS, HTTP, headers, sitemap) with no filler.

    Completeness4/5

    For a read-only diagnostics surface the coverage is strong: DNS, email auth, TLS/certs, HTTP health, redirects, security headers and sitemap auditing form a coherent lifecycle. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no latency/uptime sweep across many hosts, no whois/domain-level checks, no port-level diagnostics) but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues