load_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must bear the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It states that smartload auto-detects and runs the file, implying execution, and mentions tape inserts a REAL tape. But it does not clarify side effects like memory overwriting, whether the emulator pauses, or error handling for invalid files.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences long, with the primary action front-loaded. Every sentence is necessary and efficient, with no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description covers the main functionality and the key parameter. It explains what happens for each file_type option. However, it lacks details about return values or confirmation of success, and could mention prerequisites like file existence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the description adds context beyond the schema. It explains the default behavior (smartload) and how file_type overrides it, linking the parameter to real impact. This adds meaning beyond the enum labels.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb 'Load' and resource 'file' and specifies the context of the emulator. It distinguishes itself from siblings like 'load_snapshot' by being more general, but could explicitly differentiate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use the default smartload and when to specify file_type to force a loader, providing clear usage guidance. However, it doesn't mention when not to use the tool or alternatives among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.