Reaper MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| find_reaper_projectsD | – |
| parse_reaper_projectD | – |
| analyze_audio_filesA | Analyze audio in a Reaper project for mixing feedback. |
| list_installed_fxA | List all installed FX/plugins available in Reaper. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: finding projects, parsing a project file, analyzing audio content, and listing installed plugins. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (find_reaper_projects, parse_reaper_project, analyze_audio_files, list_installed_fx). The naming is predictable and uniform.
With only 4 tools, the server is tightly scoped to its apparent focus on Reaper project analysis and audio inspection. Each tool earns its place and the count feels appropriately minimal for the purpose.
The tool surface covers the core analysis workflow well: discovering projects, parsing their structure, analyzing audio files, and listing available FX. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no direct tool for editing or rendering), but for an analysis-oriented server the coverage is solid.