DVMCP — Damn Vulnerable MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to DVMCP — Damn Vulnerable MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn intentionally vulnerable MCP server for security training, enabling users to practice attacking and defending AI agents through realistic scenarios.2868MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA vulnerable MCP server designed for educational CTF challenges. It demonstrates various MCP security vulnerabilities in a controlled environment.8-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn educational project that deliberately implements vulnerable MCP servers to demonstrate various security risks like prompt injection, tool poisoning, and code execution for training security researchers and AI safety professionals.1,346-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA deliberately insecure MCP server for practicing penetration testing, featuring 26 challenges at three difficulty levels with flags to capture, covering vulnerabilities like RCE, SSRF, SQLi, and more.8MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA deliberately vulnerable MCP server for practicing exploitation of tool poisoning, command injection, and path traversal. Includes fixed versions and an agent demo to reproduce the issues in a controlled environment.2MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceIMCP - Insecure Model Context Protocol The DVWA for AI Security! Welcome to IMCP – a deliberately vulnerable framework that exposes 16 critical security weaknesses in AI/ML systems. Whether you're a security researcher, developer, or educator, IMCP is your playground for hands-on learning about real154JavaScript-
TDQS
Scored across 28 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, and the domain prefixes (hr., eng., fin., etc.) further prevent confusion. Even similar functions like process_payment and wire_transfer are clearly differentiated by their descriptions.
All tool names follow a consistent pattern: domain prefix (e.g., hr., fin.) followed by snake_case verb_noun (e.g., search_employees, run_payroll_report). There is no mixing of conventions or inconsistent verb usage.
28 tools is excessive for a single MCP server, exceeding the 25+ threshold. While the broad scope across multiple departments explains the count, it feels heavy and dilutes focus, making the server harder to navigate.
The tool set covers a wide range of enterprise operations (HR, engineering, finance, support, IT, marketing) but has some notable gaps such as no delete operations for most resources and no employee creation or invoice creation. This is workable but not fully comprehensive.