press_button_sequence

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the sequential nature and delay, but omits important behaviors like error handling, response on invalid buttons, or whether the sequence stops on failure. For a multi-step action tool, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences plus parameter explanations. It front-loads the core action and then details parameters efficiently. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has an output schema (not shown), so return values are covered. Parameters are well explained. However, for a sequential action tool, information about failure modes, partial execution, and potential side effects is missing, leaving gaps in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds meaningful detail beyond the schema: 'buttons_json: JSON array of {page, row, column} objects' and 'delay_ms: milliseconds to wait between presses (default 100).' This clarifies the structure and defaults not obvious from the schema alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Press multiple buttons in sequence with a configurable delay between each.' It uses specific verb (press) and resource (multiple buttons in sequence), distinguishing it from siblings like 'press_button' and 'press_bank_button'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it (sequential pressing), but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use it or mention alternatives among siblings. It lacks context for selection among similar tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.