ghl_vibe_ai_sandbox_keepalive

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full behavioral burden, but it only restates the name. It doesn't disclose side effects, idempotency, authentication requirements, or response behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief, but it sacrifices meaningful content by simply restating the tool's name. It is concise but not informative, and the single sentence does not add value beyond the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple keepalive tool, the description lacks essential guidance on when to invoke it, what the sandbox is, and what happens on success/failure. The absence of output schema makes this more critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description covers projectId with 'Vibe AI project ID', which is clear. The description adds no parameter insights, but baseline is 3 due to high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Keep Vibe AI sandbox alive' is a tautology of the tool name (keepalive). It restates the name without adding specificity about what keeping alive entails or distinguishing it from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage context is provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool, how it relates to other Vibe AI tools (e.g., ghl_vibe_ai_chat_get), or any prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.