Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to memory-garden

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Syncs Obsidian notes into a temporal knowledge graph and exposes 23 MCP tools for AI assistants to read, search, and write to your vault, enabling persistent memory across conversations.
      79
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turns your Obsidian vault into an MCP-enabled workspace with tools for reading/writing notes, managing folders, running semantic searches, and maintaining long-term memory—all while keeping data local to your vault.
      149,900 npm
      153
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only access to Obsidian vaults with semantic search, tag filtering, and metadata queries. Provides secure, intelligent note retrieval and summarization for LLMs without modifying your vault.
      8 npm
      13
      ISC
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only querying of an Obsidian knowledge base through MCP tools and resources, including full-text search, node and link retrieval, related-note traversal, and pathfinding between concepts.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Turns your Obsidian vault into an AI memory palace, enabling AI assistants to store knowledge with intent-based organization, retrieve information through full-text search, auto-link related notes, and query using Dataview syntax while maintaining provenance tracking.
      4 npm
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have clear roles, but discover_cognitive_shifts and find_change_candidates both surface 'change candidates' and could be confused; search_sources and find_interval_events also overlap in time-based retrieval. The descriptions help clarify scope, but the boundaries are not always immediately obvious.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use lowercase snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern such as search_sources, get_topic_timeline, and find_interval_events. Minor inconsistency exists between verbs like discover, find, and search for similar retrieval actions, but the overall pattern remains predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is a well-scoped size for a cognitive retrospection domain. Each tool contributes to a distinct stage of the workflow, from source discovery through evidence retrieval to the final ask_garden synthesis, with no obvious bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the main cognitive backtracking pipeline: search sources, read them, build timelines, identify change candidates, find interval events, gather hypothesis evidence, and check user verdicts. A minor gap is that there is no explicit tool to record or update user confirmations/verdicts, but this may be handled outside the server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues