td_stop_monitor_visual

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate idempotent and non-destructive behavior, but the description adds no extra context beyond the action. It does not clarify what happens if no job is running, if multiple jobs exist, or the effects of stopping (e.g., does it cancel ongoing work?). Contradiction with annotations is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single clear sentence with no unnecessary words. Efficiently conveys the core action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is simple (1 param, output schema exists), the description is minimal but leaves questions about return values, error conditions, and exact stopping behavior. Adequate but could be more helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a single parameter described. The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the schema; the mention of 'monitor id' might be misinterpreted as different from 'path'. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (stop) and resource (visual-monitor job). However, it mentions stopping 'by its monitor id' while the only parameter is 'path' described as 'TOP path being monitored', causing a slight inconsistency that could confuse the agent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like td_stream_top or td_monitor_visual. The description does not specify prerequisites, such as a job must be running, or mention any conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.