No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool has a distinct focus (transcript text vs. timed segments vs. language listing vs. in-transcript search vs. general video search vs. metadata vs. stats vs. comments vs. channel vs. channel uploads vs. categories). The main potential confusion is between youtube_get_transcript and youtube_get_timestamped_transcript, but the descriptions clarify exactly when to use each.
All 11 tools follow a strict youtube_verb_noun pattern (e.g., youtube_get_transcript, youtube_search_videos, youtube_list_channel_videos, youtube_get_video_stats). No deviations in casing or verb style.
With 11 tools, the set is well-scoped: it covers transcripts, searches, video metadata, stats, comments, channels, and categories without being bloated or thin. Each tool earns its place and no obvious overlaps require merging.
The surface covers most read-only YouTube operations, including transcript access, video/channel data, comments, and search. Primary gaps are write operations (e.g., posting comments) and replies in comments, but these may be intentional for a read-only server; the core discovery and retrieval workflows are complete.