easypanel-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to easypanel-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceFull-featured MCP server for 1Panel server management panel. Provides 490+ tools for managing websites, databases, containers, files, and more through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP Server for full Easypanel control via Claude Code, Cursor, and Claude Desktop. Provides 37 tools for deploy, logs, env vars, domains, databases, and monitoring with built-in safety guards.5736 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceThis MCP server enables AI assistants to interact with a BT Panel server through natural language, allowing users to query logs, manage websites, and monitor system status without manual panel login.987 npm10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Coolify infrastructure management, providing 45 tools for servers, applications, databases, deployments, and diagnostics via natural language.7 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA universal MCP server that provides AI agents with structured tools for filesystem, database, shell, and git operations, enabling seamless interaction with projects.19-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents full access to the Clever Cloud API through three tools: search, execute, and doc, using a code mode pattern to compose API commands.4-
TDQS
Scored across 42 tools
Most tools map to a distinct resource and action, and the resource type is almost always in the name (app vs database vs compose). A few pairs like cleanup_docker/system_prune and system_stats/service_stats/storage_stats have overlapping boundaries, but the descriptions largely clarify them.
The set largely follows verb_noun snake_case (create_app, inspect_app, destroy_app, deploy_app). Minor deviations include delete_domain instead of destroy_domain, noun-style stats tools, system_prune, and trpc_raw.
42 tools is well above the heavy threshold, and the inclusion of trpc_raw as a catch-all suggests the curated surface could be much smaller. The broad EasyPanel domain justifies some sprawl, but the count remains hard to navigate.
Core workflows for projects, apps, databases, domains, ports, mounts, compose, and system operations are present, but lifecycle coverage is uneven: ports and mounts cannot be deleted, compose has no destroy/update, and databases lack start/stop/restart. trpc_raw provides a fallback, but the first-class surface has notable gaps.