Skip to main content
Glama
draltaway

ai-visibility-mcp

by draltaway

Related Servers

Alternatives to ai-visibility-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI-visibility scoring and site auditing capabilities for websites, enabling agents to check how sites appear in AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, run full SEO/security audits, and monitor changes over time.
      15
      180 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Evaluates any website's AI visibility with 15 checks across crawlability, structure, content, and connectivity, and provides actionable fixes.
      1 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Check whether a website is visible to AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews). Returns a 0-100 readiness score, a grade, and a specific fix for each gap. Dependency-free, no API keys.
      2
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check whether a public website is crawlable, understandable, and ready for AI search workflows through local-only audits of robots.txt, sitemaps, metadata, and llms.txt.
      3
      45 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to scan any website for AI search visibility, producing AEO, GEO, agent readiness, and mention-readiness scores along with AI identity and business profile insights. Paid tools extend this to competitive comparisons, detailed audits, and generated fixes.
      4
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is clearly unique and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool with a descriptive snake_case verb_noun name. There is no inconsistency to assess, but the naming is clear and follows conventional MCP patterns.

    Tool Count3/5

    A single tool feels thin for a dedicated MCP server, even for a focused purpose. The borderline count leaves little room for related operations but is not excessively sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool directly covers the core stated purpose of checking AI visibility. Minor gaps exist, such as batch checks or historical analysis, but they do not block the primary use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues