Skip to main content
Glama
draiqw
by draiqw

Related Servers

Alternatives to tg-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A safe-by-default MCP server for real Telegram accounts powered by TDLib, enabling AI agents to read and act on your account with read-only mode and human approval for destructive actions.
      9
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that automates a single Telegram user account via the Telegram user API, enabling chat listing, reading/sending messages, searching, and additional actions through natural language.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Telegram MCP server that connects agents to a real Telegram user account via MTProto, enabling reading, searching, sending, moderating, and managing Telegram chats through natural language or automated tool calls.
      100
      92 npm
      32
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI assistants to your real Telegram account via User API (MTProto). Features default-deny ACL with per-chat permissions, message search, file sending, forwarding, media downloads, and rate limiting.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server exposes a Telegram client that runs on the user's own account, enabling AI agents to read, search, send, and manage messages, press bot buttons, and work with chats, groups, and channels from the terminal. It is read-only by default, with writes requiring explicit human approval and every action logged for safety.
      513 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 79 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct resource and action, and the close pairs (tg_download vs tg_download_many, tg_pin vs tg_pin_message, tg_mute vs tg_notify, tg_unread vs tg_pending) are explicitly cross-referenced to draw their boundaries. Despite 79 tools, none would cause genuine misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the tg_ prefix and snake_case, and families are internally consistent (send_*, *_edit, *_info, *_batch). However, the verb/noun ordering flips between forms like tg_create_group and tg_topic_create, or tg_pin_message and tg_chat_edit, so parallel operations do not always share a pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    79 tools far exceeds the 25+ 'too many' threshold and creates a heavy selection burden for an agent. The Telegram domain is genuinely broad and every tool has a distinct function, which keeps this from being an extreme mismatch, but the surface is far larger than typical MCP servers.

    Completeness5/5

    CRUD/lifecycle coverage is complete across messages, chats, drafts, scheduled messages, folders, topics and contacts, and every read tool feeds a documented follow-up (tg_media to tg_download_many, tg_topics to tg_history, tg_saved_tags to tg_search). Only niche operations like sharing a contact card or voting in a poll are absent, and none leave dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues