Pitchup.com MCP server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Pitchup.com MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude and ChatGPT to read a Timesheet Portal account, including timesheet time and cost reports, invoices, leave bookings and balances, projects or jobs, clients, users and cost centres, across both the Standard and Recruitment editions. It is read-only, with personal and pay data withheld unless explicitly requested.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLets MCP clients such as Claude and ChatGPT read a WorkMobile account's jobs, job types, forms, submitted form records, approvals and mobile users, and, when writes are enabled, create and allocate jobs and approve or reject records.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients to read an Amiqus ID account—clients, onboarding records and steps, check results, templates, case status counts and webhooks—and, when writes are enabled, create records.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceIt enables MCP clients such as Claude and ChatGPT to read an estate agency's Dezrez Rezi CRM data, including properties and their timelines, people, groups, and offers. It is read-only and applies privacy redactions by default.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLets MCP clients such as Claude and ChatGPT read a rota and time-and-attendance account, exposing venues, groups, shifts, absences and absence types, time entries, venue events and staff names through read-only tools that never return pay data.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients to read NewZapp account details, campaign reports, open heatmaps, contact groups and contact counts, and to search contacts with personal data withheld by default; when writes are enabled, it can also create and update contacts.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool targets a fairly distinct resource (campsites, pitch types, pitches, charge types, pricing, bookings, arrivals, allocations, extras). There is mild overlap between list_allocations and check_availability (both concern allocation) and between list_arrivals and list_bookings (arrivals is a filtered view of bookings), but the detailed descriptions clarify the boundaries well enough.
Most tools follow a clean get_/list_ + noun pattern (get_campsite, list_pitches, get_pricing, list_bookings). Minor deviations exist: api_root is a bare noun and check_availability uses a different verb, but the set still reads as one coherent convention.
14 tools is well within the ideal range and each maps to a distinct resource or operation in the booking-management domain. No tool appears redundant or padded.
The surface covers the full read lifecycle: account/environment, campsites, pitch types, pitches, charge types, pricing, allocations, availability, bookings, arrivals and extras. It appears intentionally read-only (no create/update/delete), which is likely by API design, though agents cannot mutate bookings or campsites. A direct get_booking for a single booking is also absent, but list_bookings largely compensates.