Engaging Networks MCP server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Engaging Networks MCP server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients to read NewZapp account details, campaign reports, open heatmaps, contact groups and contact counts, and to search contacts with personal data withheld by default; when writes are enabled, it can also create and update contacts.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients to search a membership database's people and organisations, read a contact's summary and membership history, list events with ticket types and attendance lists, read invoices, and find and count segments. When writes are enabled, it also lets clients record who attended an event.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients to read a financial adviser's CRM data—clients, households, reviews due, tasks, cases, plans and notes—and, when writes are enabled, create tasks and notes.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLets Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients read a SmartSurvey account's surveys, survey designs, responses, exports and folders, and — when writes are enabled — open or close a survey or send an existing invitation to one named recipient. It runs read-only by default, redacting respondent contact details and phone-number-like text unless contact details are explicitly requested.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients to look up members, their memberships and credentials, events and event bookings, and clubs and other organisations in a sports membership platform, and, when writes are enabled, to change the dates of a member's membership.9MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude and ChatGPT to read a campsite's supplier account data from the Pitchup.com API — campsites, pitch types, pitches, charge types, prices and stay rules, allocation, extras and arrivals and bookings. When writes are explicitly enabled, it also sets allocation, prices and charge types, with writes off and the sandbox environment used by default.14MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: list vs get for automations, pages and questions, separate supporter lookup vs query, and dedicated transaction/field/question list tools. The only potential overlap is find_supporter vs query_supporters, but the descriptions clearly delineate single-record lookup from filtered listing.
All names use snake_case verb_noun constructions with predictable plural/singular forms (list_marketing_automations, get_marketing_automation; list_pages, get_page). Verbs vary (list, get, find, query) but remain semantically appropriate and consistent throughout.
10 tools for a multi-entity CRM/advocacy platform is well-scoped; each tool covers a needed read operation without redundant or filler entries.
The surface is entirely read-only and omits create/update/delete for all entities, which is a notable gap for a platform management server. There are also dead ends for required IDs: no tool lists marketing automation folders or supporter profiles referenced by list_marketing_automations and query_supporters, and transaction-level detail retrieval is absent.