get_release_series

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only states what the tool does. It does not mention pagination, rate limits, authentication needs, or any side effects. The 'limit' parameter hints at pagination but is not explained. The output schema exists but is not described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: one sentence for purpose and two lines for parameters. Every sentence adds value, and the most important information is front-loaded. No unnecessary words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 parameters, output schema exists), the description is adequate but incomplete. It lacks usage guidelines and behavioral context. While the purpose and parameter meanings are clear, the agent may need more info (e.g., return format, prerequisites) to use it effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must add meaning. It does so by explaining 'release_id: Release ID to get series for' and 'limit: Maximum number of series to return (default: 100)'. This provides context beyond the schema's type/title. However, it could be more detailed (e.g., where to find release_id).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Get all series for a specific FRED release.' The verb 'Get' and resource 'series for a specific FRED release' are specific and unambiguous. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_releases' (which retrieves releases) and 'get_series_info' (info on a single series).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description does not mention any context or conditions for use, nor does it suggest when not to use it. The agent must rely solely on the tool name and sibling list to infer usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.