abap-adt-doZimple
Related Servers
Alternatives to abap-adt-doZimple
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceGives AI agents controlled, full-CRUD access to real ABAP repositories through ADT on SAP ECC/S/4HANA on-premise and BTP ABAP Cloud systems, so analysis and changes are grounded in system data. Supports where-used and dependency analysis, object metadata and repository navigation, transports, and iterative creation, reading, updating, and deletion of classes, interfaces, function groups/modules, programs, DDIC, and CDS/view/service artifacts.3,404 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely read and write SAP ABAP development objects via the ADT REST API, enforcing policy-based guardrails such as package/namespace allow-lists, read-only mode, human approvals, and audit logging.82MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read, write, activate, and transport ABAP code in SAP systems via ABAP ADT REST API, without needing SAP GUI.24541 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to connect directly to SAP ABAP systems via ABAP Development Tools, so they can retrieve and manage source code for programs, classes, interfaces, functions, tables, and CDS views. Also supports RAP development, running unit tests and coverage checks, inspecting transports and version history, and working across multiple SAP systems.65MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform ABAP Development Tools operations on SAP ERP (ECC and S/4HANA) systems, including source code editing, object activation, syntax checks, and ABAP unit tests.8 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants like Claude Code to directly connect to SAP ABAP systems via the ADT REST API with read/write capabilities, featuring AI-friendly high-level tools and built-in safety measures such as read-only mode, prefix whitelisting, and automatic locking.9541 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only a single tool there is no possibility of overlap or misselection, so ambiguity between tools is zero. However, the tool's own purpose ('Estado de la configuración de sistemas SAP') is vague and does not clearly state what action it performs or returns.
The single name 'sap_systems' uses a clean snake_case convention, but it is a bare noun phrase with no verb, so no predictable verb_noun pattern exists to evaluate. With one tool, consistency is neither violated nor demonstrated.
A single tool is far too thin for a server named 'abap-adt-doZimple', which implies ABAP ADT development operations such as reading, editing, activating, and transporting objects. One config-status tool cannot cover that scope.
The surface is severely incomplete: an ABAP/ADT server would need tools for object retrieval, source editing, activation, transports, and system listing, yet only one status-report tool is exposed. Agents would hit immediate dead ends for any real development workflow.