Skip to main content
Glama
dougsureel-tech

RadMail MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to RadMail MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides an email operating system for AI agents, enabling inbox triage and reply drafting while enforcing un-bypassable safety constraints on sensitive actions like money transfers and banking changes.
      12
      102 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A proxy service that sits between AI agents and email, providing safe access with read-only design, PII redaction, blocklists, and sanitization.
      12
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run real email operations across multiple IMAP/SMTP and provider OAuth accounts — syncing, searching, reading, drafting, attaching, and sending mail — while requiring explicit human approval for sending, deleting, or forwarding and recording an inspectable audit trail.
      224,325 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to send and receive email with enforced security policies, scoped mailboxes, and human approval for external sending.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents their own email address with inbound parsing, classification, extraction, and prompt injection screening, plus tools to manage mailboxes, send/receive emails, and handle draft approval workflows.
      14
      56 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct actions (triage, list, draft, search, read) and resources (message, inbox, commitment). The main overlap is between triage and triage_inbox (single vs batch) and triage vs why_surfaced (both explain surfaced reasoning), but descriptions clearly differentiate scope. Minor ambiguity exists but selection is unlikely to go wrong.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The majority follow a verb_noun pattern (draft_reply, list_commitments, read_email, provision_sandbox, report_need, request_capability). However, 'triage' and 'search' are single verbs, 'triage_inbox' has a noun-like first word, 'list_right_now' uses an adverb phrase instead of a noun, and 'why_surfaced' inverts the pattern. This mix of conventions is readable but not fully consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    12 tools is well-scoped for an email triage and management server. Each tool serves a clear purpose, covering core operations (triage, list, search, read, draft) and meta/feedback functions without bloat. The count fits comfortably in the ideal 3-15 range.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core lifecycle: triage messages (single/batch), explain surfaced reasons, list and draft commitments, search and read emails. Minor gaps exist: no way to update or close commitments, no send/archive actions, and the Right Now lane is read-only. These are workarounds, not dead ends, so the surface is mostly complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive