hover

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full behavioral disclosure burden. It only states the basic action, omitting details like whether the element is scrolled into view, whether hover events are triggered, what happens if the element is not visible, or whether the tool waits for actionability.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence that conveys the primary purpose without wasted words. It is concise and easy to parse, though it is brief to the point of under-specification.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple tool (1 parameter, no annotations, no output schema), the description is minimal but leaves out important operational context such as hover behavior in dynamic pages, coordination with other automation steps, and any side effects. The absence of any usage guidance or behavioral notes makes it incomplete for reliable agent decision-making.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'selector' is fully described in the schema as 'CSS or XPath selector.' The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning, but schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Move the mouse over an element' clearly states the action using a specific verb and resource. It is distinct from sibling tools like 'click' and 'press' by specifying the hover action, though it does not explicitly differentiate itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use hover versus alternatives like 'click' or 'type'. The description lacks context such as 'use hover to reveal tooltips or dropdown menus' or any mention of element actionability prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.