mihomo-ai-failover
Related Servers
Alternatives to mihomo-ai-failover
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables macOS users to securely connect AI assistants such as Notion AI, Claude, and Cursor to their local files and terminal through an MCP server protected by a Bearer token and Cloudflare Tunnel.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that functions as an intelligent gateway for multiple LLM backends including OpenAI, Claude, and Ollama. It supports automatic provider fallback, streaming responses via Server-Sent Events, and real-time monitoring for robust AI integration.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTurns a Mac into an MCP host exposing terminal, filesystem, browser automation, and macOS controls to approved AI clients via OpenAI's Secure MCP Tunnel.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceOpen-source, local macOS MCP server for AI agents. Automate background Safari/Chrome tabs, native apps, files and shell with scoped permissions, optional approvals and delegated coding agents.80MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for managing local dev ports on macOS. It enables AI agents to inspect listening ports, identify owning processes and parent chains, kill processes safely, wait for ports, and report LAN exposure.2 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that enables AI assistants to execute local development tools and retrieve system status with low latency over stdio or HTTP.154 npm3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes, but a few pairs like get_status/list_pools and check_provider_paths/run_health_check could be confused without careful reading. The detailed descriptions help differentiate them, so overall ambiguity is low.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., preview_install, run_health_check, uninstall_monitor). There are no mixed conventions, and the verb clearly indicates the action.
With 20 tools, the set is on the heavier side, but each tool addresses a distinct phase of the failover lifecycle (preview, install, monitor, rollback). Given the complexity of the domain, the count is justifiable, though some status tools could potentially be consolidated.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle from environment diagnosis and provider overrides to installation, monitoring, and uninstallation. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for updating failover settings after initial config, but users can work around this.