get_website_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. 'Get' indicates a read-only operation, which is helpful, but the description does not disclose return format, error behavior, or whether the data is static or dynamic. With zero parameters, the tool is straightforward, but more detail would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that clearly states the tool's purpose without unnecessary detail. It is well-structured and front-loaded, providing the key information efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity (no parameters, no output schema), the description is mostly complete. It names the resource and gives examples, but it could be more explicit about the return structure (e.g., whether it returns a single URL or a collection). Since the output schema is absent, a tiny bit more detail on the response format would push this to a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema is empty (no parameters), and the description does not discuss parameters because there are none. Per the calibration baseline, zero parameters receive a 4. The description's examples add context but do not need to explain parameter semantics that do not exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves official URLs for PindouAI tools, with specific examples (pattern generator, gallery). The verb 'Get' and resource 'official URLs' are precise, and the tool is clearly distinct from its sibling get_recent_patterns, which focuses on patterns rather than URLs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when one needs website URLs for PindouAI tools, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives or provide any exclusions. Since the tool is simple and the sibling tool serves a different purpose, the implied context is adequate but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.