Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-broker

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A localhost broker that allows multiple MCP clients to share a persistent xcrun mcpbridge connection to Xcode, enabling tool discovery and serialized calls.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP proxy and aggregation platform. Register multiple upstream MCP servers and expose them through a single unified endpoint with namespace routing, multi-transport support (HTTP/SSE, stdio, OpenAPI→MCP), per-tool overrides, and a web admin UI.
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local MCP auth wrapper and credential broker for multi-account workflows, enabling profile switching, secret injection, and policy enforcement for upstream MCP servers.
      71 npm
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Runs multiple upstream MCP servers behind one local process, keeping sessions persistent and exposing a compact, policy-aware surface for tools, resources, and prompts via HTTP, CLI, and MCP-native clients.
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Finds MCP servers in the MCP Rating index and connects to them on demand, proxying their tools under namespaced names and notifying the client when tools change. Each server gets a short environment allowlist plus only the variables you name for it, so other API keys in your environment aren't passed on. Files aren't isolated unless you opt into Docker containers.
      13
      801 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool occupies a distinct role in the broker workflow: status, search, describe, call, and session cleanup. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the broker_ prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern: broker_search_tools, broker_describe_tool, broker_call_tool, broker_close_session. broker_status deviates slightly since it reads as a noun rather than verb_noun, but the naming remains clear and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is an appropriate size for a broker gateway server. Each tool covers a necessary step in the broker interaction lifecycle without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers the full broker workflow: check status, search for tools, inspect a tool, call it, and close the session. No essential operation appears missing for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive