academic-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to academic-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAcademic paper search and retrieval MCP server integrating multiple scholarly platforms into a unified interface. Supports search, fetch, trend analysis, and literature review workflows.819 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for academic research workflows, enabling paper searching across multiple sources, manuscript processing with citation placeholders, search caching, and citation export.11MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceUnified MCP server for scientific literature search and extraction, integrating databases like Scopus, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, and Unpaywall to enable AI agents to discover papers, track citations, and analyze content.27MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMulti-source academic paper search, citation graph exploration, and PDF download as an MCP server, designed for LLM agents doing research.6118 PyPI3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA MCP server for academic literature retrieval, aggregating multiple data sources like arXiv, Crossref, OpenAlex, PubMed, and Semantic Scholar to provide search, details, citations, trends, and recommendations.4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP server for searching scientific papers, retrieving metadata and abstracts, and legally downloading Open Access PDFs via OpenAlex, CrossRef, and Unpaywall APIs.53MIT
TDQS
Scored across 21 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes. The main overlap is between search_literature and individual source searches (search_cnki, search_wos, search_deepxiv), but search_literature is described as a unified search across sources, reducing ambiguity. All other tools target specific resources or operations.
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (check_, login_, search_, get_, export_, etc.) with snake_case. Minor inconsistency: check_academic_sources differs from the check_*_status pattern, but overall naming is predictable and clear.
21 tools is appropriate for a multi-source academic literature server. Each tool serves a distinct function, covering search, retrieval, status checks, login, export, and local collection management without being excessive.
The tool set covers the main workflows for CNKI, WoS, and DeepXiv: search, detail retrieval, status, login, and export. Local collection management is present (save, list, get) but lacks explicit update/delete tools. Download is limited to CNKI. Minor gaps exist but do not severely hinder agent operation.