tochka_send_closing_document_email

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only include openWorldHint, signaling unknown side effects. The description does not elaborate on behavioral traits such as whether sending consumes the document, requires authentication, or has rate limits. It adds minimal context beyond the argument source.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise: one sentence plus two bullet-like argument explanations. It is front-loaded with the purpose. No wasted words, but could be more structured (e.g., separate sections for usage).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the openWorldHint and the existence of an output schema, the description could be more complete. It does not explain the output, potential side effects, or prerequisites (e.g., must have a valid document). The agent may need to infer behavior from the tool name and siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema description coverage at 0%, the description adds meaning: 'Closing document UUID from tochka_upd result' and 'Recipient email address'. This provides sourcing context but lacks validation rules or examples. Baseline is adequate but not rich.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Send closing document to specified email address', which is a specific verb (send) and resource (closing document). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like tochka_send_invoice_email (for invoices) and tochka_download_closing_document (download vs send).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description hints that document_id comes from tochka_upd result, but does not explain when to prefer this over sending an invoice email or other actions. No exclusions or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.