Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to deployctl

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bridges AI coding assistants with website codebases, local git repositories, and shared hosting via FTP/SFTP, enabling code discovery, file management, git operations, smart deployments, backups, and rollbacks.
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage website deployments over SFTP/FTPS by listing sites, testing connections, comparing files, previewing changes with approval tokens, creating SHA-256 verified backups, and executing authorized uploads.
      7
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform FTP/FTPS/SFTP file operations including upload, download, sync, and directory management with multi-server support.
      36
      52 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect and manage remote hosts over SSH with tiered blast-radius containment that classifies and blocks destructive commands, plus forensic post-flight assertions that verify ports, processes, files, and HTTP health. It also provides long-running background task envelopes and atomic SFTP file editing with automatic backups, unified diffs, and one-click rollback.
      12
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage remote servers via SSH, including command execution, multi-host batch operations, SFTP file transfer, background job handling, DevOps diagnostics, port tunneling, and safety guardrails like high-risk command blocking and read-only mode.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct actions: list/show projects, deploy, test connectivity, browse remote directories, download a remote file, and modify target configuration. There is mild overlap between list_projects and show_project, and between browse_remote_directories and download_remote_file when inspecting remote files, but descriptions largely clarify the boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_projects, deploy_project, test_connection, show_project, browse_remote_directories, download_remote_file, set_target_option, set_remote_path. The convention is predictable throughout.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well within the appropriate range for a deployment management server. Each tool covers a distinct operational need such as listing, inspecting, testing, deploying, remote browsing, downloading, and target configuration.

    Completeness3/5

    The core deployment workflow is covered: inspect projects, test connectivity, browse remote paths, deploy, download remote files, and update target options/paths. However, notable lifecycle operations are missing, such as creating/removing projects or targets, listing deployment history, and rollback, which may force agents to work around the tool surface or fail on onboarding/recovery tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues