A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceTracks AI agent token usage and spending in real time, with budget alerts, per-task cost breakdown, and a visual dashboard.
6
1
MIT
Inferrail
by domondi1
Related Servers
Alternatives to Inferrail
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first cost tracking and model routing for MCP agents with offline token counting, budget alerts, and spend reports.28 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides real-time AI model pricing, cost estimation, and budget management tools to help agents understand and optimize their spending. It enables agents to compare costs across multiple providers and select the most cost-effective models for specific tasks.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to track LLM costs, enforce budgets, compare models, and estimate expenses through simple tool calls.-
ComputeGauge MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides cost intelligence and a reputation scoring system to help AI agents optimize spending through smart model selection and local-to-cloud routing. It enables real-time cost tracking and rewards agents for making efficient, high-credibility decisions across various LLM providers.Apache 2.0- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceCompare AI inference pricing across 9 providers in real time. Routing recommendations, spend tracking, and budget alerts for AI agents.102 npmMIT
TDQS
A4.1/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
get_health and get_spend are clearly distinct: one checks gateway reachability and recent receipt, the other aggregates spend from the local ledger. There is no overlap in purpose or side effects.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow the same get_ verb_noun convention (get_health, get_spend), creating a predictable and consistent pattern for the server's small surface.
Tool Count3/5
With only 2 tools, the server feels thin, though the narrow scope of health and spend monitoring makes the count understandable. It is at the low end of acceptable for a focused read-only utility set.
Completeness4/5
The server covers the two core monitoring concerns for an Inferrail gateway: health and spend. Minor gaps like a tool to list available routes or models exist, but the current surface is sufficient for basic observability.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive