Skip to main content
Glama
dominikstefanski

clinic-mcp

by dominikstefanski
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to clinic-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • health-example

      pietrodileo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables secure, read-only access to synthetic preventive-care patient records and bounded IRIS namespace health metrics through a small set of allowlisted, parameterized tools.
      1
      MIT

    • Governed MCP Server

      johannespietsch
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server reference implementation adding enterprise layers (identity, authorization, audit) around MCP, with sample shipment status and delayed shipment tools over a stateless transport.
      Apache 2.0

    • tenant-scoped-crm

      gvprime
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A reference MCP server demonstrating safe agent access to multi-tenant CRM data with tenant isolation enforced in the data layer, role-based permissions, and human confirmation on writes.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: booking appointments, escalating to on-call, finding slots, recording intake, and searching protocols. No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, making it easy to predict the action and resource for each tool.

    Tool Count5/5

    With exactly 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a clinic domain, covering core patient-facing and administrative workflows without being overly heavy or thin.

    Completeness3/5

    The set covers appointment creation, urgent escalation, slot availability, intake recording, and protocol search. However, it lacks read/update/delete for appointments and any patient or provider management, which are notable gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources