starling-bank-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to starling-bank-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP Server that provides a conversational interface to the UK Open Banking account information API, allowing agents to interact with bank account data through natural language commands.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that exposes banking data (connections, accounts, balances, transactions) and agent skills, allowing AI agents to query and refresh financial data via stdio.124 npm6Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for the Monei API that gives AI agents access to wallets, transfers, crypto sends, swaps, offramp, and bill payments through natural language.245 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Mercury Banking API that enables listing accounts and retrieving transactions via natural language.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the FreeAgent accounting API, enabling LLMs to securely access and manage accounting data including contacts, invoices, bills, bank transactions, and more.5 npm1MIT

moolre-mcpofficial
FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that exposes Moolre's API as 24 tools for AI agents, enabling account management, transfers, payments, SMS, and WhatsApp operations.24-
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and the entity_action naming makes intent clear. The main ambiguity is between transactions_list and the feed_item_* family, which both concern transactions, though descriptions clarify that a feed item is a transaction. savings_goal_deposit vs withdraw and payment_create vs payee_create are clearly distinguishable.
Nearly all tools follow a consistent noun_verb pattern (accounts_list, payment_create, card_lock_update, savings_goal_delete). The only deviations are inconsistent pluralization of the entity prefix (accounts_list vs account_balance_get, savings_goals_list vs savings_goal_create), which is a minor blemish rather than a convention break.
24 tools is on the heavier side but justified by the breadth of the banking domain (accounts, feed items, payees, payments, cards, direct debits, standing orders, savings goals). Each tool maps to a real operation, with little redundancy, though the set sits at the upper end of what stays manageable.
Coverage is strong: savings goals have full CRUD plus deposit/withdraw, feed items support read/update/attachment workflows, and read-only surfaces exist for accounts, cards, direct debits, and standing orders. Gaps remain around payments (create only, no list/cancel) and standing orders/direct debits (list only), but these are minor and workable.