Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to okf-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local OKF-compatible knowledge engine for AI agents. Enables capturing agent conversations, hybrid semantic+keyword search, MCP serving to agents, interactive graph visualization, and OKF bundle export.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with a local, private Markdown-based memory vault and SQLite search. Enables agents to search, read, list, and traverse linked knowledge pages via MCP with zero external runtime dependencies.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A project-agnostic Open Knowledge Format MCP server that indexes Markdown concepts with YAML frontmatter and provides CLI and MCP tools for search, validation, and graph navigation of structured knowledge.
      28
      130 npm
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes: list_types, list_tags, and list_relation_types each target different entities, while graph traversal tools (get_neighbors, find_paths, get_graph, get_subgraph) are clearly differentiated by scope. A few pairs like list_bundles and list_remote_bundles could cause minor confusion but descriptions clarify local vs remote.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is inconsistent: some tools use a verb_noun pattern (list_types, get_concept) while others have a nonstandard 'okf_' prefix (okf_validate_concept, okf_list_proposals). Also, 'graph_summary' breaks the verb-first convention, and 'check_v02_migration' mixes letters and numbers. The mixed styles reduce predictability.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 28 tools, the surface is quite large for what appears to be a read-only graph and validation server. While not extreme (≤50), it exceeds the typical comfortable range and many tools feel like minor variations on similar read/validate operations, suggesting the set could be consolidated.

    Completeness3/5

    The toolset covers reading, searching, validating, and exporting graph data, plus proposal listing/reading, but lacks any creation or update tools for concepts or bundles. Given the emphasis on validation and proposals, there is no direct 'create_concept' or 'submit_proposal' tool, leaving a notable gap in the complete authoring lifecycle.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive