chrometools-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to chrometools-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAutomates browser actions through AI with 39 tools including navigation, tab management, JavaScript execution, and cookie access, using a Chrome extension for local automation.397,578 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides complete browser automation capabilities for AI agents via 44 tools, including navigation, element interaction, state management, and session recording.583 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to control Chrome using real user profiles, providing undetectable automation with over 40 tools for navigation, data extraction, and interaction.346 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAutomate your real Chrome browser locally with AI, supporting vision, human-like input, code execution, macros, and watchdogs.18 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides browser automation, AI-powered analysis, visual processing, web scraping, automated test generation, and DevTools analysis capabilities. Supports multiple AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama) for intelligent web interaction and data extraction.-
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to directly control your real Chrome browser with full context including login sessions, cookies, and open tabs. It provides tools for page scanning, JavaScript execution, CDP control, screenshots, and physical mouse/keyboard input for authentic browser automation.20243MIT
TDQS
Scored across 59 tools
Several tools have overlapping purposes, such as executeModelAction vs click/type/selectOption, and analyzePage vs smartFindElement vs getElementDetails. However, detailed descriptions help distinguish many of them, though the volume creates ambiguity.
All tools use camelCase with a mostly verb-first pattern (get, list, search, click, type, etc.). A few names like smartFindElement and executeModelAction break the pattern slightly, but overall naming is consistent.
With 59 tools, the server is excessively large. While it covers multiple domains (browser automation, Figma, scenarios, API models), many tools could be consolidated, making the surface overwhelming.
The server covers browser automation, iframe handling, network, console, Figma design, scenario recording, and API model generation comprehensively. Minor gaps exist (e.g., cookie management, file upload), but the core workflows are well covered.