Skip to main content
Glama
doazvjettu

leakguard-mcp

by doazvjettu
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to leakguard-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • StratVerity MCP Server

      mathieusarrue-alt
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables auditing and verification of algorithmic trading backtests from coding agents like Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf, including look-ahead bias detection, overfitting checks, and sealed audit proof verification.
      3
      MIT

    • Lanalyzer MCP Server

      hkxiaoyao
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI models to perform static taint analysis on Python code, detecting security vulnerabilities by tracking data flows from sources to sinks.
      9
      AGPL 3.0
    • prodlint by prodlint

      prodlintofficial

      prodlint
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Static analysis for vibe-coded apps. Flags security, reliability, performance, and AI quality issues in code generated by Cursor, v0, Bolt, and Copilot.
      575 npm
      15
      MIT

    • VulniCheck

      andrasfe
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered security scanner for Python projects and GitHub repositories. Detects vulnerabilities, secrets, and provides AI risk assessment.
      11
      MIT

    • backtester-mcp

      bcosm
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Local-first backtesting engine with built-in overfitting detection (PBO, deflated Sharpe, bootstrap CI, walk-forward) and a native MCP server for AI agents to validate trading strategies.
      4
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: listing rules, explaining a single rule, scanning code from a string, scanning a single file, and scanning files by glob. There is no ambiguity; an agent can easily distinguish between them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores. The verbs vary but are descriptive, and the nouns specify the target clearly. This pattern is predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a linter. It provides rule introspection and scanning at three levels of granularity without unnecessary clutter, making the count appropriate for its purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core lifecycle: rule discovery (list_rules), rule understanding (explain_rule), and scanning (lint_code/file/paths). Minor gaps like rule configuration or suppression are absent, but the essential functionality is complete for standard usage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources