Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to opensrc-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to search and access open-source code, documentation, and package information via a local MCP server.
      1,996 npm
      113
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that indexes TypeScript/JavaScript projects and returns budget-aware, dependency-optimized context packs for AI coding assistants.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables coding agents to safely verify npm/PyPI packages, retrieve cited briefs, discover GitHub repos, and fetch canonical docs, with fail-closed OSV vulnerability checks and injection-hardened output.
      117 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Agent-safe code retrieval MCP server that indexes repositories and provides semantic search, file navigation, call graph analysis, and bounded file reading tools for coding agents.
      2,693,148 npm
      3
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that parses codebases into semantic chunks, indexes them in SQLite with vector embeddings, and exposes MCP tools for LLM agents to query.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool encompasses a well-defined API, and its purpose is clearly described in the description.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The server has a single tool named 'execute', which is consistent in itself. While the name is generic, there are no other tools to compare against, so no naming inconsistencies exist.

    Tool Count2/5

    The domain covers fetching, searching, reading, and managing source code from multiple ecosystems, which is a broad scope. Exposing all of this through a single monolithic tool is overly condensed; separate tools for distinct operations (e.g., fetch, read, grep) would be more appropriate for agent discoverability.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers listing, fetching, reading, searching (grep and astGrep), and removal of sources, which is comprehensive for exploration. However, it lacks explicit update/edit capabilities for source files and no direct way to modify code, leaving a minor gap in mutation workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues