get_sensor_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description lacks behavioral details such as side effects, authentication needs, or what constitutes 'full details'. Since the description carries the full burden, it is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two focused sentences, front-loading the purpose and including an args section that efficiently documents the parameter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (not shown) and a simple single-parameter tool, the description covers the basic purpose and parameter but lacks usage guidance and behavioral context, making it minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning to the 'id' parameter by stating it is 'The sensor object ID', which is not present in the schema's property definition. However, it does not explain how to obtain the ID or any constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'full details for a specific sensor', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_sensors' (list) and 'get_sensor_history' (historical data).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like get_sensors or search. It does not mention that an ID is required, which is only implied by the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.