hs4.admin.cameras.recording.set

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only says 'set a camera recording state'. It does not mention that this is a mutation requiring confirm, changeTicket, or maintenanceWindowId, nor does it describe side effects, permission requirements, or audit implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 10 words, with no redundancy. It is concise and directly to the point, earning a high score for minimalism.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 12 parameters, no output schema, and is a high-stakes admin mutation. The description omits return values, error cases, and the need for confirmation or maintenance windows, leaving the agent underinformed about operational context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already describes 75% of parameters, including const for domain and descriptions for most fields. The description adds no additional semantic value beyond the schema, so the baseline score applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'set' and the resource 'camera recording state' with scope 'admin controls'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like hs4.cameras.list or hs4.admin.cameras.config.update, focusing on recording state rather than other camera operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like hs4.admin.cameras.config.update or hs4.cameras.pan. The description does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or context for invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.