Skip to main content
Glama
dlaporte

openai-usage-mcp

by dlaporte
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to openai-usage-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Cost Management MCP

      knishioka
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for unified cost tracking and analysis across AWS, OpenAI, and Anthropic. It enables users to query expenditures, compare costs across providers, and analyze usage trends through natural language.
      10
      MIT

    • ai-usage-mcp

      flaviozantut
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for querying AI usage metrics (exact tokens, cost, latency, errors, productivity) from a local SQLite database, enabling charts and analysis in Claude Code and Cursor.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: costs for dollar spend, usage for token/request counts, and cost-comparison for month-over-month variance. The descriptions explicitly cross-reference 'DO NOT USE THIS TOOL FOR' statements, eliminating ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names are primarily single-word nouns (costs, usage) with one hyphenated compound (cost-comparison). While not following a verb_noun pattern, the names are short and readable, though the hyphen introduces a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is a well-scoped count for an OpenAI usage/cost tracking server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of the domain (cost, usage, comparison) and fits within the ideal 3-15 tool range.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core domain of cost and usage tracking, including summary, daily, and raw detail levels, plus month-over-month cost comparison. Missing a dedicated usage-comparison tool or project/service listing, but these are minor and can be worked around via parameters.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources