mcp-azure-tablestorage
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| query_tableA | ⚠️ WARNING: This tool returns a limited subset of results (default: 5 items) to protect the LLM's context window. DO NOT increase this limit unless explicitly confirmed by the user. Query data from an Azure Storage Table with optional filters. Supported OData Filter Examples:
Supported Operators:
|
| get_table_schemaC | Get property names and types from a table |
| list_tablesC | List all tables in the storage account |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: get_table_schema retrieves metadata about table structure, list_tables enumerates available tables, and query_table fetches actual data from tables. The descriptions clearly differentiate these operations, making tool selection unambiguous for an agent.
All three tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern (get_table_schema, list_tables, query_table) with perfect consistency in style and structure. The naming convention is predictable and follows the same grammatical pattern throughout the tool set.
With only 3 tools, this server feels somewhat thin for Azure Table Storage operations. While the tools cover basic read operations, the absence of create, update, or delete operations for tables or entities makes the surface incomplete for typical database workflows. The count is borderline minimal for the domain.
The tool set has significant gaps for a database/storage system. There are no tools for creating tables, inserting entities, updating entities, or deleting tables/entities - only read operations exist. While the query capabilities are well-documented, the lack of write operations creates dead ends for agents trying to perform complete data management workflows.