list_boxes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It correctly characterizes the operation as listing (implied read-only), but does not explicitly state that it is read-only, nor does it mention any behavioral traits like pagination, sorting, or rate limits. The description is adequate but not enhanced beyond the bare minimum.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the main action and includes the key optional filter. Every word is necessary and informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists (though not shown), the description does not need to explain return values. However, it omits details like whether the listing is paginated or returns all boxes. The description is complete enough for a straightforward list operation, but could mention the output format briefly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage; the description adds meaning by clarifying that the 'group' parameter is a 'group ID'. This provides context beyond the schema's bare type and default. However, it does not explain the expected format or where to obtain group IDs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('List') and resource ('Firewalla boxes') along with scope ('on this MSP account'), and mentions optional filtering by group ID. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like list_devices or list_alarms.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by stating the action and optional filter, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., list_devices for devices, not boxes). No when-not-to-use or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.