A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceUse XAI's latest api functionalities with Grok MCP. It supports image understanding and generation, live search, latest models and more.
22
51
MIT
UniGrok
by djtelicloud
Related Servers
Alternatives to UniGrok
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOne local gateway for all your MCP servers — shared by every AI coding tool (Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex). Set up each server once; keys stay in the OS keychain; lazy discovery keeps agent context small. Local-first, open source.4130211MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA zero-config local desktop proxy gateway for AI coding agents, providing model failovers, spend caps, and 1-click MCP tool syncing across multiple client environments.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA minimal local MCP server that lets Claude Desktop or Claude Code delegate coding tasks to Grok Build running headless as a subagent.5291MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for integrating xAI's Grok model into OpenAI Codex Desktop/GUI, enabling direct Grok calls via chat completions or responses with OAuth or API key authentication.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local, zero-dependency MCP server that cuts coding-agent round-trips by aggregating search, read, edit, exec, git, and savings tools into single, validated calls, with cost tracking and no data leaving the machine.MIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 47 tools
Disambiguation2/5
Many tools have overlapping purposes, such as multiple chat/agent tools (`agent`, `chat`, `grok_agent`, `stateful_chat`) and multiple model listing tools (`list_models`, `list_models_detailed`). While descriptions attempt to differentiate, the overlap is significant and would likely cause misselection.
Naming Consistency2/5
Tool names are inconsistent in style: some are short single words (`agent`, `chat`), while others use long snake_case phrases (`grok_mcp_discover_self`, `remote_code_execution`). No clear pattern emerges, mixing verbs and nouns.
Tool Count2/5
47 tools is excessively high for a single MCP server. While the server covers many domains (chat, git, knowledge, media, etc.), the tool set would be more coherent if split into specialized servers. The count feels unwieldy.
Completeness4/5
The server covers a wide range of functionality including chat, agent, file management, web/X search, code execution, research jobs, knowledge memory, git operations, and media generation. Minor gaps exist (e.g., missing git push/pull, knowledge update), but overall it is fairly complete for its domain.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessWithin a week