Skip to main content
Glama
djm81

Log Analyzer MCP

by djm81
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Log Analyzer MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • log-mcp

      ascii766164696D
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for log file analysis. Gives LLMs the ability to efficiently analyze large log files without loading them into context.
      7
      100
      MIT

    • Log Analyzer MCP Server

      suriya-ML
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for intelligent log analysis providing semantic search, error pattern clustering, and smart error detection. It enables users to process, vectorize, and query local logs to efficiently identify issues and generate AI-powered summaries.
      MIT

    • Log Analyzer MCP

      Fato07
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for AI-powered log analysis that enables parsing, searching, and debugging across nine log formats directly within Claude. It features automated error extraction, sensitive data scanning, and streaming support for large log files.
      14
      5
      MIT

    • roo-activity-logger

      annenpolka
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that automatically logs AI coding assistant activities such as command executions and code generation, saving them as JSON files for later search and analysis.
      3
      25
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is significant overlap between the test-running tools (run_tests_no_verbosity, run_tests_verbose, run_tests_very_verbose, run_unit_test) which could cause confusion about which to select for different verbosity needs. However, the search_log_* tools are well-differentiated by their temporal focus, and analyze_tests vs. create_coverage_report serve distinct purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (analyze_tests, create_coverage_report, search_log_all_records, etc.). The main deviation is get_server_env_details which uses a get_ prefix instead of a more descriptive verb, and ping which is a single word outlier, but overall the naming is quite predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    12 tools is reasonable for a log analyzer server that also handles testing. While the count is appropriate, the distribution feels slightly imbalanced with many test-running tools and fewer log analysis tools, but it's still within a well-scoped range.

    Completeness3/5

    For log analysis, the search tools provide good temporal coverage but lack operations like log ingestion, filtering by severity, or aggregation. For testing, there are multiple execution tools but no tools for test setup, teardown, or result comparison. The surface covers core workflows but has notable gaps in both domains.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources