Skip to main content
Glama
disrex-group

Plane MCP Server

by disrex-group
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Plane MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Plane MCP Server by makeplane

      Plane MCP Serverofficial

      makeplane
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI interfaces to seamlessly interact with Plane's project management system, allowing management of projects, issues, states, and other work items through a standardized API.
      5
      46
      121 npm
      340
      MIT

    • Plane MCP

      Rockysingh116
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables LLMs to fully manage a Plane workspace, including projects, work items, states, labels, cycles, modules, comments, and members.
      38
      MIT

    • claude-plane

      FishyF1sh
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server and automation watcher for Plane project management, enabling Claude to interact with Plane via 40+ tools and auto-trigger on labeled issues.
      -
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 76 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific resources and actions, with no ambiguity. For example, tools like 'add-issues-to-cycle' and 'remove-issue-from-cycle' are complementary but distinct, and operations like 'create-issue' versus 'create-sub-issue' are well-defined.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb-noun pattern with hyphens throughout (e.g., create-issue, list-issues, update-cycle). All tools adhere to this convention, making them predictable and readable without any mixing of styles.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 76 tools, the count is excessive for most agent use cases, likely causing cognitive overload and inefficiency. While the domain is comprehensive, this many tools feels heavy and could overwhelm users or agents trying to navigate the API surface.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for the project management domain, including issues, cycles, modules, states, labels, and more. There are no obvious gaps; every major operation (create, read, update, delete, list) is covered for all key resources.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources