A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI applications to access 20+ model providers (including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) through a unified interface for text and image generation.
2
30
MIT
Just Prompt
by disler
Related Servers
Alternatives to Just Prompt
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via official CLI394MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA universal MCP server for spawning agents with any OpenAI-compatible LLM, supporting cloud and local models, and integrating with Claude Code, OpenCode, and Codex CLI.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that functions as an intelligent gateway for multiple LLM backends including OpenAI, Claude, and Ollama. It supports automatic provider fallback, streaming responses via Server-Sent Events, and real-time monitoring for robust AI integration.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides an AI LLM orchestrator supporting multiple providers (LM Studio, Ollama, OpenAI, generic) plus SQLite-backed memory, kanban, and todo databases for persistent task and knowledge management.-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that enables AI coding assistants to interact with Google's Gemini AI through the official CLI.3MIT
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation3/5
There is significant overlap between 'prompt', 'prompt_from_file', and 'prompt_from_file_to_file', all centered on sending prompts to multiple models, which could cause confusion. However, 'ceo_and_board' adds a distinct decision-making layer, and 'list_models' and 'list_providers' are clearly separate informational tools, helping to mitigate ambiguity.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun or verb_from_noun pattern (e.g., 'list_models', 'prompt_from_file'), with consistent snake_case throughout. The only deviation is 'ceo_and_board', which uses a noun-based name that breaks the verb-led convention, but it's still readable and not chaotic.
Tool Count5/5
With 6 tools, this server is well-scoped for its purpose of managing and prompting LLM models. The count is sufficient to cover core functionalities like listing providers/models and various prompting methods without being overwhelming or too sparse.
Completeness4/5
The toolset covers key operations for LLM interaction: listing providers and models, basic prompting, file-based prompting, and an advanced decision-making tool. A minor gap exists in lacking update or delete operations for prompts or models, but agents can likely work around this for typical use cases.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive