textual_stop
Stop a running Textual app session by providing its session ID.
Instructions
Stop a running Textual app session.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Stop a running Textual app session by providing its session ID.
Stop a running Textual app session.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide destructiveHint=true. The description adds minimal context beyond 'running,' not disclosing idempotency, confirmation, or effects on unsaved state.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence with no wasted words, front-loading the action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple stop operation with destructive hint and output schema, but missing guidance on error states or prerequisites like session existence.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain what session_id is, its format, or how to obtain it, adding no value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (stop) and the resource (a running Textual app session), distinguishing it from sibling tools like textual_launch (start) and textual_press (key press).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use vs. alternatives or prerequisites. The purpose is implied but lacks details on when not to use (e.g., session already stopped).
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/discohead/textual-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server