Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to turbosign-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with the BoldSign e-signature platform through its API. Supports managing documents, templates, contacts, users, and teams for electronic signature workflows.
      14
      27 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables users to create, manage, and track electronic signing requests and templates through Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients. Provides multi-tenant authentication with customer API keys for secure document workflow operations.
      66 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables access to all DocuSign product APIs through curated tools and raw API calls, with OAuth support for hosted MCP clients.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      E-signature for AI agents. One unauthenticated call returns a sandbox API key (no account, no browser), then the agent can send documents for signature, check status, and download the sealed PDF plus Certificate of Completion.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables integration with the ZapSign API for electronic document signing and management, including document, template, signer, webhook, and background check operations through MCP tools.
      225 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a unique, focused purpose: setup guides credential configuration, configure saves credentials, whoami displays current identity, send/review/status/download/void/resend/audit_trail handle distinct stages of the signing workflow, and get_instructions/refresh_tools are server utilities. The only near-overlap is send vs review, but the explicit 'emails nobody' distinction makes them unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Ten of twelve tools use the turbosign_ prefix, which is a strong pattern, but get_instructions and refresh_tools break it. Within the prefixed tools, some names are verbs (send, review, download) and some are nouns (status, audit_trail, whoami), so the convention is not perfectly uniform.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 12 tools, the server covers the full signing lifecycle plus setup and utility functions without redundancy. This is a well-scoped size for an e-signature MCP server.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the entire document signing workflow: credential setup, configure, send, review, status, download, void, resend, and audit trail. Minor gaps, like a list-documents tool, but the core workflows are fully supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues