List API keys
list_api_keysRetrieve metadata of your API keys without exposing the secret values.
Instructions
List your API keys (metadata only, never the secret value).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
list_api_keysRetrieve metadata of your API keys without exposing the secret values.
List your API keys (metadata only, never the secret value).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses that secret values are never returned, which is a key behavioral trait. Lacks details on pagination or potential rate limits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with the action and a critical caveat. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple zero-parameter list tool, the description is complete enough. It omits the structure of metadata but that is not essential for invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist; schema coverage is 100%. Description adds no parameter info, which is appropriate since there are none.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it lists API keys, with the crucial clarification that it only returns metadata, never secrets. Distinguishes from sibling tools that handle account, balance, usage, or captchas.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when to use or not, but the purpose is clear and sibling tools are distinct. Implied usage for retrieving API key metadata.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/disasm-dev/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server