discord_admin_channels

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already indicate destructive behavior, and the description simply lists operations without adding context such as whether operations are reversible, require special permissions, or have side effects (e.g., audit-log reasons). It repeats what the schema enum already exposes, adding no behavioral insight beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the core purpose. Every word contributes to naming the operations and the resource, with no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters and 7 distinct operations, the description is far too brief to be contextually complete. It does not mention that parameter requirements vary by operation, nor does it describe expected return values or error conditions. An agent would need to infer critical usage details from the schema alone, which is insufficient for safe/effective invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers 60% of parameters with descriptions, but the tool description does not explain how parameters map to each operation. For instance, it never states that delete requires channelId or that set_permission needs channelId, targetId, and data. The prose adds no meaning beyond the schema's existing field descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly enumerates the specific operations this tool performs (list, create, update, delete, reorder, modify permission overwrites) and identifies the resource as 'rooms and categories' (Discord channels). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like discord_admin_roles or discord_list_channels.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not clarify that read-only channel listing is handled by discord_list_channels, nor does it explain when to choose specific operations. The only implied usage arises from the operation list itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.