Skip to main content
Glama
dingdawg

dingdawg-healthcare-agent

by dingdawg

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
patient_intakeA

Free AI patient intake form with triage priority and symptom analysis. Returns structured intake locally. Deep LLM-powered ICD-10 coding and clinical reasoning with API key.

clinical_summaryA

Summarize clinical notes into structured format. Extracts chief complaint, HPI, assessment, plan. Requires DINGDAWG_API_KEY for LLM-powered summarization.

hipaa_checkA

Free HIPAA compliance quick check for processes and systems. Returns basic compliance gaps locally. Deep LLM-powered audit with API key.

appointment_schedulerC

AI-powered appointment scheduling with conflict detection and optimization. Requires DINGDAWG_API_KEY.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct healthcare function—patient intake, clinical summarization, HIPAA compliance, and scheduling. There is no overlap in purpose or output, making misselection unlikely.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names follow a consistent <domain>_<function> snake_case pattern (e.g., patient_intake, hipaa_check). The suffix types vary between nouns and verbs, but the overall naming is predictable and uniform.

Tool Count4/5

Four tools is a reasonable, focused set for a healthcare agent, each earning its place in the workflow. The count is slightly lean but still well-scoped.

Completeness3/5

The set covers intake, summarization, compliance, and scheduling, but lacks basic CRUD operations for patients or appointments (e.g., no get, update, or delete). This leaves notable gaps for ongoing management.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues