Skip to main content
Glama
dingdawg

dingdawg-finance-agent

by dingdawg

Related Servers

Alternatives to dingdawg-finance-agent

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform financial reconciliation with a deterministic proof engine: intake files, match transactions, verify proofs, resolve exceptions, and sign off on balanced journals under the user's authority.
      21
      -
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered skills for financial professionals. Comprehensive collection of finance, accounting, audit, and compliance skills for AI agents. IFRS/GAAP compliant with industry-specific applications.
      100
      20
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An AI-powered financial management engine that enables budgeting, smart expense tracking, and affordability analytics via the Model Context Protocol. It allows AI assistants to interact with financial data through natural language for tasks like category detection, bulk expense ingestion, and budget impact predictions.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with deterministic, offline finance tools for commodity margin analysis, loan covenant compliance, invoice auditing, AP exception classification, and five-day close readiness.
      14
      17 npm
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables governed, read-only SQL analytics, hybrid RAG knowledge search, financial metric calculation, and database schema introspection through MCP, with role-based access control, audit logging, and AI observability.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct financial domain: compliance (regulatory rules), analysis (ratio health), forecasting (budget scenarios), categorization (expense flags), and risk assessment (portfolio/business risk). No two tools overlap in purpose, and their descriptions reinforce clear boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent noun_verb/verb_noun pattern using snake_case: compliance_check, financial_analysis, budget_forecast, expense_categorize, risk_assessment. The pattern is predictable and consistent, matching the style of well-organized MCP servers.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a financial agent, covering common user requests without being bloated or minimal. Each tool has a clear role, and the count is squarely within the recommended range for a focused server.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the major financial workflows an agent might need: compliance verification, ratio analysis, forecasting, expense tracking, and risk assessment. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated tool for tax estimation or investment portfolio management, but these are beyond the core scope and agents can typically work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues