Skip to main content
Glama
dingdawg

DingDawg Agent Spend Policy MCP

Official
by dingdawg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to DingDawg Agent Spend Policy MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MandatePay

      muhammadashir0
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to request payment authorization against signed human mandates, enforcing policy-as-code limits and returning a decision (authorize, challenge, or deny) without moving funds.
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • Vaikora Guard MCP by Data443

      Vaikora Guard MCPofficial

      Data443
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enforces deterministic policies on AI agent tool calls, evaluating actions against compliance modules (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, etc.) and returning ALLOW, BLOCK, or CONSTRAIN decisions with an audit trail.
      MIT

    • FLINT Agent Passport

      thefraudfather
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables verification of AI agent identity, authority, and integrity at transaction time, returning signed verdicts for allow, step-up, review, or block.
      MIT
    • Safe4 by Safe4AI

      Safe4official

      Safe4AI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify proposed payments against their assigned task, budgets, permitted categories, and counterparties, returning an ALLOW or DENY decision with a tamper-evident audit trail.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of overlap or ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The sole tool name 'evaluate_spend_policy' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, and with no other tools, there are no inconsistent conventions.

    Tool Count4/5

    A single tool is slightly thin, but it is well-scoped for the server's narrow purpose of evaluating spend policies. The count is reasonable and not trivial.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool fully covers its domain: it deterministically evaluates a proposed action against policy and explicitly avoids out-of-scope actions. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources